Current:Home > MyCourt orders white nationalists to pay $2M more for Charlottesville Unite the Right violence -PureWealth Academy
Court orders white nationalists to pay $2M more for Charlottesville Unite the Right violence
View
Date:2025-04-18 23:43:53
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Four years after violence erupted during the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, a jury ordered white nationalist leaders and organizations to pay a total of more than $26 million in damages to people with physical or emotional injuries from the event.
Most of that money — $24 million — was for punitive damages, but a judge later slashed that amount to $350,000 — to be shared by eight plaintiffs. On Monday, a federal appeals court restored more than $2 million in punitive damages, finding that each of the plaintiffs should receive $350,000, instead of the $43,750 each would have received under the lower court’s ruling.
A three-judge panel of the Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the jury’s award of $2 million in compensatory damages, but found that a state law that imposes the $350,000 cap on punitive damages should be applied per person instead of for all eight plaintiffs, as a lower court judge ruled.
The ruling stems from a federal lawsuit against two dozen white nationalists and organizations that participated in two days of demonstrations in Charlottesville to protest the city’s plan to remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee.
On the second day, after the “Unite the Right” rally had been declared an unlawful assembly, James Alex Fields Jr., a white supremacist from Maumee, Ohio, intentionally drove his car into a crowd of counter-protesters, killing one woman and injuring dozens more. Fields, who was one of the defendants in the civil case, is now serving a life sentence for murder and hate crimes.
The 4th Circuit panel rejected a request from the defendants that the court ask the Supreme Court of Virginia to rule on the question of whether each plaintiff can receive $350,000 in punitive damages, saying in its ruling that it found the state law’s language and history “clear enough to predict how Virginia’s high court would rule.”
“Over two years ago, the jury used its $24 million punitive damages award to send an unmistakable message to the defendants and to the public about the outrageous misconduct that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia. While the law compels us to reduce the award, it’s long past time for that message to be delivered,” Chief Judge Albert Diaz wrote in the 3-0 ruling.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs said they were pleased by the court’s ruling.
“Today’s decision restores over $2 million in punitive damages from the jury’s verdict, which sent a clear message against racist and antisemitic hate and violence,” attorneys Roberta Kaplan, David E. Mills and Gabrielle E. Tenzer said in a statement.
Lawyers for the defendants did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment.
The verdict from the 2021 trial was a rebuke to the white nationalist movement, particularly for the two dozen individuals and organizations accused in a federal lawsuit of orchestrating violence against African Americans, Jewish people and others in a meticulously planned conspiracy.
veryGood! (55731)
Related
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Search for survivors in Baltimore bridge collapse called off as effort enters recovery phase
- McDonald's to start selling Krispy Kreme donuts, with national rollout by 2026
- Costco is cracking down on its food court. You now need to show your membership card to eat there.
- 'Meet me at the gate': Watch as widow scatters husband's ashes, BASE jumps into canyon
- California Restaurant Association says Berkeley to halt ban on natural gas piping in new buildings
- Famed American sculptor Richard Serra, the ‘poet of iron,’ has died at 85
- California’s Latino Communities Most at Risk From Exposure to Brain-Damaging Weed Killer
- Carolinas bracing for second landfall from Tropical Storm Debby: Live updates
- Why did the NFL change the kickoff rule and how will it be implemented?
Ranking
- How breaking emerged from battles in the burning Bronx to the Paris Olympics stage
- Maps and video show site of Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse in Baltimore
- 2024 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 392 Final Edition brings finality to V-8-powered Wrangler
- Kansas moves to join Texas and other states in requiring porn sites to verify people’s ages
- 'Meet me at the gate': Watch as widow scatters husband's ashes, BASE jumps into canyon
- Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ lawyer says raids of the rapper’s homes were ‘excessive’ use of ‘military force’
- Lego head mugshots add to California’s debate on policing and privacy
- Case against woman accused in death of adopted young son in Arizona dismissed, but could be refiled
Recommendation
How effective is the Hyundai, Kia anti-theft software? New study offers insights.
Stock market today: Asian shares are mixed after Wall Street retreats from all-time highs
Los Angeles Rams signing cornerback Tre'Davious White, a two-time Pro Bowler
Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul fight could be pro fight or exhibition: What's the difference?
Clay Aiken's son Parker, 15, makes his TV debut, looks like his father's twin
Debunked: Aldi's bacon is not grown in a lab despite conspiracies on social media
Flaco the owl's necropsy reveals that bird had herpes, exposed to rat poison before death
Kristen Doute's Nipple-Pinching Drama on The Valley Explained